Citation

Zegeer CV, Reinfurt DW, Hunter WW, Hummer J, Stewart R, Herf L. Transp. Res. Rec. 1988; 1195: 33-47.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to (1) develop one or more methods for quantifying roadside hazard, (2) define factors that influence run-off-road accidents, and (3) estimate the accident benefits of various roadside improvements. Detailed traffic, accident, roadway, and roadside data were collected on 4,951 miles of two-lane rural roads in seven states. Roadside data included development and use of a pictorial seven-point roadside hazard scale, a measure of roadside recovery (clear zone) distance, field sideslope measurements, and detailed types of and lateral distances to roadside obstacles. Statistical testing was used along with log-linear modeling to determine the interactive effects of roadside and roadway features on accidents. Flatter sideslopes of 3:1 to 7:1 were found to be related to lower rates of single-vehicle accidents. However, only a 2 percent reduction in single-vehicle accidents was found for a 3:1 sideslope compared to a 2:1 sideslope. Reductions in related accidents due to general roadside improvements were found to range from 19 percent to 52 percent, depending on the amount of roadside improvement. Trees and utility poles are the roadside objects most often struck. Obstacles associated with the highest percent of severe accidents include culverts, trees, utility and light poles, bridges, rocks, and earth embankments.

Record URL:
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1988/1195/1195-004.pdf

Language: en

Keywords

Highway Systems; Risk Studies; Roads and Streets--Accidents