SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Glickman TS. Transp. Res. Rec. 1988; 1193: 22-28.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences USA, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Consistent, reliable estimates of release accident rates are essential when using risk assessment to compare the safety of rail and truck for a given shipment of hazardous materials. The estimates that appear in the literature have shortcomings or inconsistencies that make it difficult, if not impossible, to perform such a comparison. Yet claims are made that one transport mode is safer than the other, and risk assessors are using estimated accident rates that are out of date or inaccurate. This paper derives benchmark estimates of release accident rates for the two modes using Department of Transportation (DOT) incident reports to count the number of release accidents in 1982, and official statistics of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) and the Census Bureau to evaluate the level of exposure to release accidents in that year. In addition to providing useful reference data for future risk assessments, the results show that there can be no general answer to the question of which mode is safer, since it depends on the release accident rate (which varies with release severity, carrier type, vehicle type, and track or road type) and such other factors as the size and design of the containers used.

Record URL:
http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1988/1193/1193-003.pdf


Language: en

Keywords

Hazardous Materials; Motor Truck Transportation; Risk Studies--Assessment; Railroad Transportation; Accidents--Estimation

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print