Citation

Torices MIM, Hidalgo-Ruzzante N, Daugherty JC, Jiménez-González P, García MP. J. Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2018; 29(1): 86-98.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/14789949.2017.1339106

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Neuropsychological consequences in female survivors of intimate partner violence are being used in courts as evidence of acquired injury and for criminal exculpation. To support the validity of neuropsychological test performance and the veracity of victim testimony, effort tests can be used by expert witnesses. Nevertheless, no study has evaluated whether the two principle types of effort tests, Symptom validity tests or Performance validity tests, are most adequate for this population. The study's objective was to compare the false positive rates of a Performance validity test (Test of Memory Malingering: TOMM) and a Symptom validity test (Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: SIMS). The sample included 68 female intimate partner violence victims and 40 control females. SIMS showed a significantly higher rate of false positives in victims on four of five subtests, reaching a 59.3% in the total score. There were 0% false positives in both groups on the TOMM.

FINDINGS indicate that the SIMS may incorrectly score female IPV victims, undermining the victim's testimony in judicial cases.

Language: en

Keywords

effort tests; Intimate partner violence; performance validity; symptom validity