SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Andrews KL, Gallagher S, Herring MP. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2019; 29(6): 780-790.

Affiliation

Health Research Institute, Limerick, Ireland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/sms.13411

PMID

30779389

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present review synthesized the available empirical evidence to provide support of the effectiveness and feasibility of exercise interventions for improving health and fitness of firefighters.

METHODS: Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before May 2018 were located using Google Scholar, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science. RCTs involved 462 (18 Females) active-duty firefighters, an exercise intervention, and reported changes in health and/or fitness. Hedges' d effect sizes quantified the magnitude of the effects of exercise compared to control conditions. Aggregated mean effects for differential modes of exercise (aerobic exercise training (AET), resistance exercise training (RET), or combined (AET+RET) were also calculated. Random effects models were used for all analyses.

RESULTS: Exercise significantly improved body fat percentage (Δ=0.52, [95% CI:0.16-0.88] z=2.81, p=0.005, k=4), aerobic capacity (Δ=1.20, [0.52-1.87] z=3.48, p=0.000, k=8), endurance (Δ=1.74, [0.94-2.53] z= 4.03, p=0.000, k=10), strength (Δ=1.27, [0.42-2.11] z=2.93, p=0.003, k=9), and power (Δ=1.02, [0.52-1.52] z=4.00, p=0.000, k=2). Specifically, RET improved body fat percentage (Δ=0.87, [0.38-1.36], z=3.47, p=0.000, k=2), aerobic capacity (Δ=3.06, [2.37-3.75], z=8.65, p=0.000, k=2), endurance (Δ=2.79, [1.48-4.09], z=4.19, p=0.000, k=6), strength (Δ=1.44, [0.49-2.39], z=2.97, p=0.002, k=8), and power (Δ=1.02, [0.52-1.52] z=3.99, p=0.000, k=2), while AET improved aerobic capacity (Δ=0.69, [0.24-1.15], z=3.01, p=0.000, k=3), and AET+RET improved aerobic capacity (Δ=0.52, [0.15-0.89] z=2.78, p=0.005, k=3) and endurance (Δ=0.44, [0.19-0.70] z=3.41, p=0.000, k=3).

CONCLUSIONS: The present results provide evidence of the positive effects of exercise interventions, particularly RET, to improve outcomes of health and fitness associated with superior job performance and reduced risk of injury and CVD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Resistance exercise; health promotion; randomized controlled trials

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print