SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Cully G, Corcoran P, Leahy D, Griffin E, Dillon C, Cassidy E, Shiely F, Arensman E. J. Affect. Disord. 2019; 246: 843-850.

Affiliation

School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; National Suicide Research Foundation Ireland, 4.28 Western Gateway Building, Cork, Ireland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.372

PMID

30795489

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk of self-harm repetition has consistently been shown to be higher following self-cutting compared to intentional drug overdose (IDO) and other self-harm methods. The utility of previous evidence is limited due to the large heterogeneous method categories studied. This study examined risk of hospital presented self-harm repetition according to specific characteristics of self-harm methods.

METHODS: Data on consecutive self-harm presentations to hospital emergency departments (2010-2016) were obtained from the National Self-Harm Registry Ireland. Associations between self-harm method and repetition were analysed using survival analyses.

RESULTS: Overall, 65,690 self-harm presentations were made involving 46,661 individuals. Self-harm methods associated with increased repetition risk included minor self-cutting, severe self-cutting, multiple drug IDOs involving psychotropic drugs and self-harm by blunt object. Minor self-cutting was the method associated with highest repetition risk (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.38, 95% CI 1.31-1.45). Risk of repetition was comparable following IDOs of four or more drugs involving psychotropic drugs (AHR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.20-1.39), severe self-cutting (AHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.16-1.34) and blunt object (AHR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.42). LIMITATIONS: Information was not available on suicide or other causes of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS: Self-harm method and the associated risk of repetition should form a core part of biopsychosocial assessments and should inform follow-up care for self-harm patients. The observed differences in repetition associated with specific characteristics of IDO underline the importance of safety planning and monitoring prescribing for people who have engaged in IDO.

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.


Language: en

Keywords

Mental health; Risk assessment; Risk factor; Self-harm; Self-harm method; Self-harm repetition

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print