SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Fede SJ, Grodin EN, Dean SF, Diazgranados N, Momenan R. Neuroimage (Amst) 2019; 22: e101782.

Affiliation

Clinical NeuroImaging Research Core, National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, MSC 1108, United States. Electronic address: rezam@nih.gov.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101782

PMID

30921611

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the United States, 13% of adults are estimated to have alcohol use disorder (AUD). Most studies examining the neurobiology of AUD treat individuals with this disorder as a homogeneous group; however, the theories of the neurocircuitry of AUD call for a quantitative and dimensional approach. Previous imaging studies find differences in brain structure, function, and resting-state connectivity in AUD, but few use a multimodal approach to understand the association between severity of alcohol use and the brain differences.

METHODS: Adults (ages 22-60) with problem drinking patterns (n = 59) completed a behavioral and neuroimaging protocol at the National Institutes of Health. Alcohol severity was quantified with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). In a 3 T MRI scanner, participants underwent a structural MRI as well as resting-state, monetary incentive delay, and face matching fMRI scans. Machine learning was applied and trained using the neural data from MRI scanning. The model was tested for generalizability in a validation sample (n = 24).

RESULTS: The resting state-connectivity features model best predicted AUD severity in the naïve sample, compared to task fMRI, structural MRI, combined MRI features, or demographic features. Network connectivity features between salience network, default mode network, executive control network, and sensory networks explained 33% of the variance associated with AUDIT in this model.

CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the neural effects of AUD vary according to severity. Our results emphasize the utility of resting state fMRI as a neuroimaging biomarker for quantitative clinical evaluation of AUD.

Published by Elsevier Inc.


Language: en

Keywords

Alcohol use disorder; Connectivity; Imaging; MRI; Machine learning; Multimodal

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print