SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Gill JR, Olko HG, DeJoseph ME. Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol. 2019; 40(3): 238-241.

Affiliation

From the Connecticut Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Farmington, CT.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/PAF.0000000000000479

PMID

30969176

Abstract

This study on cremation clearance examines whether physical inspections detect more unnatural unreported deaths than medicolegal investigations without inspections. We reviewed all deaths reported to the medical examiner for cremation clearance during 2 distinct years and compared subsequent amendments of death certificates after 2 different investigative methodologies (1 with and 1 without physical inspection). Of 10,367 deaths in 2012, there were 86 deaths (0.83%) in which the investigation with physical inspection resulted in amendments to the death certificate. Of 11,906 deaths in 2016 without physical inspection, there were 153 that resulted in amendments (1.3%) including 2 homicides. For the detection of accidents, there was no statistically significant difference (χ = 0.8119, P = 0.367552). For cremation investigations, the work effort and costs of performing physical inspections do not appear justified given the similar detection rates (approximately 1%) for unnatural deaths among the 2 groups. Both methods, however, do detect unreported unnatural deaths.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print