SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

King JC, Franklin RC, Devine S, Watt K, Leggat PA. Health Promot. J. Austr. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Australian Health Promotion Association, Publisher CAIRO Publishing)

DOI

10.1002/hpja.254

PMID

31002469

Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Cycling participation rates in Australia and Queensland remain low. Rural residents typically do not have distinct cycling infrastructure available for use. Investigating current cycling participation and barriers to cycling engagement will inform future work to promote cycling engagement.

METHODS: Data was collected through the inclusion of cycling related questions in the 2012 Queensland Social Survey.

RESULTS: The majority of the sample had not cycled in the previous 12 months (66%; n=831). Significantly more rural residents reported not cycling due to environmental concerns (p<0.05) and preferring other modes of transport or exercise (p<0.01. Rural cyclists (31.4%; n=113) had higher levels of cycling engagement in the previous week (41.6% to 32.6% urban; χ2 =7.83; n= 420; p= <0.05) but lower cycling durations than urban cyclists (41.6% rural residents cycling for 30+ minutes vs 57.4% urban residents; χ2 =8.25; n= 418; p= <0.01). Rural cycling engagement was independently associated with being male (OR= 2.34; 95%CI= 1.40-3.91); sufficient physical activity engagement (OR= 1.86; 95%CI= 1.10-3.15); and having children at place of residence (one or two children: (OR= 3.21; 95%CI= 1.88-5.49; 3+children (OR= 3.01; 95%CI= 1.17-7.75).

CONCLUSIONS: One third of all adults cycled in the previous 12 months irrespective of location; however reasons for not cycling varied by urban/ rural location.

RESULTS indicate that environmental factors appear to be inhibiting cycling participation in rural areas. Advocating for government commitment for infrastructure development to support safe cycling across Queensland including outside of metropolitan areas is required. SO WHAT?: This research explores self-reported cycling engagement amongst a sample of urban and rural dwelling Queenslanders. Differences in cycling exposure and reasons for lack of engagement offer insights into what may encourage greater cycling participation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Health; bicycle; frequency; motivation; physical activity; rural; urban

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print