SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

McHugh CM, Chun Lee RS, Hermens DF, Corderoy A, Large M, Hickie IB. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2019; 116: 51-60.

Affiliation

CRE Optymise, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, 94 Mallett street, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia; Brain and Mental Health Laboratory, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.05.012

PMID

31195164

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impulsivity is considered a possible phenotype underlying the expression of self-harm and suicidal behaviors. Yet impulsivity is a not a unitary construct and there is evidence that different facets of impulsivity follow different neurodevelopmental trajectories and that some facets may be more strongly associated with such behaviors than others. Moreover, it is unclear whether impulsivity is a useful predictor of self-harm or suicidal behavior in young people, a population already considered to display heightened impulsive behavior.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in Medline, PubMed, PsychInfo or Embase between 1970 and 2017 that used a neurocognitive measure to assess the independent variable of impulsivity and the dependent variable of self-harm and/or suicidal behavior among young people (mean age < 30 years old).

RESULTS: 6183 titles were identified, 141 full texts were reviewed, and 18 studies were included, with 902 young people with a self-harm or suicidal behavior and 1591 controls without a history of these behaviors. Deficits in inhibitory control (13 studies, SMD 0.21, p-value = 0.002, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.08-0.34), prediction interval (PI) = 0.06-0.35) and impulsive decision-making (14 studies, SMD 0.17, p-value = 0.008, 95% CI (0.045-0.3), PI = 0.03-0.31) were associated with self-harm or suicidal behavior. There were no significant differences between measures of different facets of impulsivity (ie. delay discounting, risky decision-making, cognitive or response inhibition) and self-harm or suicidal behavior.

CONCLUSION: Multiple facets of impulsivity are associated with suicidal behavior in young people. Future suicide research should be designed to capture impulsive states and investigate the impact on different subtypes of impulsivity.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Adolescent; Cognitive inhibition; Delay discounting; Deliberate self-harm; Impulsivity; Non-suicidal self-injury; Response inhibition; Suicidal behavior; Young people

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print