SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bruïne G, Vredeveldt A, Koppen PJ. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2018; 32(4): 463-473.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2018, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1002/acp.3419

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Nowadays, more and more people report about their memories in cross-cultural contexts. In international criminal settings and asylum procedures, object recognition tests can provide valuable information, for example, about weapons used during a crime or landmarks from the claimed region of origin. This study was the first to compare object recognition performance by asylum seekers from Sub-Saharan Africa to a matched Western European control group. African participants performed worse than European participants on perceptual tests involving transformations from two- to three-dimensional representations, but both groups performed equally well on an object recognition test that involved transformation from three- to two-dimensional representations. However, African participants were significantly more likely to respond "yes" on the recognition test (i.e., an acquiescence response style) than European participants. Our findings elucidate cultural differences in responding on an object recognition test. Judges, juries, and immigration officials would be wise to take these differences into account when evaluating recognition performance in cross-cultural contexts.


Language: en

Keywords

asylum seekers; cross-cultural psychology; eyewitness memory; object recognition; signal detection theory

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print