SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Crago RV, Renoult L, Biggart L, Nobes G, Satmarean T, Bowler JO. Brain Res. 2019; ePub(ePub): 146387.

Affiliation

School of Psychology, Lawrence Stenhouse Building (LSB), University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.bowler@uea.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, International Brain Research Organization, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146387

PMID

31419430

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the neural correlates of aggression-related attentional selectivity to angry faces in physical aggression. Physical aggression in a non-clinical sample of young men (N = 36) was measured using an aggression questionnaire. Visual attentional bias to angry faces was assessed using a dot-probe task during which angry and neutral faces were presented simultaneously, and EEG was recorded. Median split and correlational analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between physical aggression and attentional bias. Behavioural results indicated that higher levels of physical aggression were associated with greater attentional bias to angry faces. ERP results revealed an interaction where males with higher physical aggression had undifferentiated P3 amplitudes to angry and neutral trials, whereas low physical aggression males exhibited greater P3 amplitude to angry than to neutral trials (effect of probe congruency). Increased levels of physical aggression were also significantly correlated with increased P3 amplitude to probes replacing neutral faces, relative to angry faces. It was concluded that the aggressive males selectively attend to angry faces, and that attentional bias is characterized by undifferentiated P3 amplitude. We propose that this results from an inferior ability to downregulate competing angry face distractors when responding to probes replacing neutral faces (as reflected by the P3 response). These findings indicate that attentional bias to angry faces in individuals with higher physical aggression is characterized by a distinctive ERP signature; this could inform the development of therapeutic interventions seeking to reduce aggression.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.


Language: en

Keywords

Angry faces; Attentional bias; Event-related potential; P3; Physical aggression

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print