SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Patterson T, Hobbs L, McKillop N, Burton K. J. Sex. Aggress. 2019; 25(2): 161-176.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13552600.2019.1581281

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study investigated whether there are disparities in the way in which police proceed against females and males who commit sexual offences. We explored whether there are discrepancies in the severity of court sentences handed down to female and male sexual offenders. Using police and sentencing data, we compared the proportion of females and males who proceeded to court action once charged with a sexual offence and, separately, the severity of sentencing handed down to both genders. In terms of police decision-making processes, compared to males, a smaller proportion of females proceeded to "court action" for their offences. Furthermore, the severity of sentences handed down to males was greater than those handed down to females, both generally and when the sexual offence could be directly matched. These findings are discussed in the context of gender differences in how these crimes are processed and implications for justice, intervention, and community safety.


Language: en

Keywords

court action; Female sexual offender; gender differences; sentencing disparities; sexual offending

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print