Citation

Yonashiro-Cho J, Rowan JM, Gassoumis ZD, Gironda MW, Wilber KH. J. Elder Abuse Negl. 2019; ePub(ePub): 1-22.

Affiliation

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles , CA , USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/08946566.2019.1647326

PMID

31423950

Abstract

Resolving elder abuse, neglect, and self-neglect often requires the authority and expertise of multiple providers. Prior research of the elder abuse forensic center (FC) model, although limited, has indicated strong member support, increases in prosecution of abusers, and increases in conservatorship for those lacking capacity. This study expands on previous single-site research by conducting a cross-site multimethod evaluation of four established FCs to better describe the model and inform its replication with fidelity. Data were compiled from FC administrative data, site visits completed from 2011-2012, and a follow-up telephone interviews conducted in 2018. Site characteristics, processes, desired outcomes, and long-term sustainability were compared. All FCs had dedicated staff who convened a multidisciplinary team (MDT) of medical, legal, and social services providers to jointly engage in case review, consultation, and provision of supportive professional services. Similar results were observed across all sites in team effectiveness and member-perceived improvements in personal practice and inter-agency relationships. While three programs had unified philosophies and practice approaches, one employed a distinct model and was no longer in operation at follow-up. Commonalities in case characteristics, program structure, processes, and outcomes provide insight into the core model components and a foundation for continued program replication and standardization.

Language: en

Keywords

Intervention; evaluation; evidence-based; multidisciplinary team; promising practice; sustainability