Citation

Felix ED, Meskunas HM, Jaramillo N, Quirk M. Psychol. Trauma 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Department of Counseling, Clinical, and School Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/tra0000514

PMID

31556635

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Researchers have studied the influence of media exposure to acute mass violence (e.g., terror attack, mass shooting, etc.) on distress in populations not directly experiencing the trauma; however, the field has yet to achieve consensus on the measurement of media exposure. There has been a rapidly changing media environment since this body of research began, with the rise of social media. To address this, we developed a measure using the most relevant items from media exposure surveys and accounting for evolving social media.

METHOD: We asked a sample of youth and adults (N = 1,249), ages 14 - 59 years old, about average time spent consuming news in general, time spent viewing coverage of specific terror attacks, and their emotional reactions to the media coverage.

RESULTS: A confirmatory factor analysis specifying a 3-factor model was run on a subsample of the data (n = 308), and the data fit the model well, χ2(17) = 30.799, p <.05, root mean square error of approximation =.051 [90% confidence interval =.020,.080], comparative fit index =.989, and standardized root mean square error of approximation =.043. Measurement invariance was examined on the remainder of the participants (n = 937) to determine whether the model was invariant across participant sex.

CONCLUSION: Analyses support that the factor structure of the measure was consistent across male and female participants. Implications on measuring media exposure to acute mass violence will be discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Language: en