SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

van Soest D, Tight MR, Rogers CDF. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2019; 65: 316-333.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.005

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

In order to transform urban transport systems to get a potentially healthier and happier travelling public, it is important to understand how people perceive different urban travel modes, since this can affect their travel satisfaction, health and well-being. These perceptions were explored for five transport modes (walking, cycling, car driving, using bus and using train), in four areas in Birmingham, UK. The areas were chosen to reflect differing levels of deprivation and public transport provision. Data were collected using a postal questionnaire, which included a 'free associations' methodology. Respondents had to write down the first three associations that come to mind when thinking about each of the five modes, and subsequently rated how positive or negative each association felt to them. Perceptions of all modes except car driving differed significantly across the four neighbourhoods. The level of deprivation seemed to play a particularly distinctive role, as did the availability of public (rail) transport. There were strong relationships between the perceptions of a transport mode and its use, and sometimes also the use of other modes. Exploring perception using a free associations methodology provides insights into the strengths and weaknesses of transport modes as perceived by citizens from different backgrounds, as well as their predisposition to change modes.


Language: en

Keywords

Affective image analysis; Free associations; Mode choice; Perceptions; Sustainable transport planning

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print