SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Couture M, Vincent C, Gelinas I, Routhier F. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Centre of Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration , Quebec city , Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/17483107.2019.1673837

PMID

31617768

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the advantages of training on a driving simulator versus on the road, when learning to drive with new assistive technologies (AT) in individuals with motor impairments. Method: An experimental group (EXP = 16) that trained on a driving simulator was compared to a comparison group (CMP = 16) that received training only on the road. A post-training road test assessed driving performance. Analysis included proportion of participants who successfully completed the on-road driving test, number of training sessions, level of satisfaction, simulator sickness, advantages and discomforts. Results: EXP and CMP were comparable for age (48 ± 17 years), sex (13 M, 3 F), and AT (3 steering wheel knobs with integrated switches, 4 left accelerators, 9 hand controls and steering wheel knobs). No significant difference was observed between groups in the proportion of participants who were found to be fit to drive (EXP: 9/16; CMP: 13/16; p = 0.126) or in the number of sessions completed (EXP: 4.3; CMP: 3.2; p = 0.061). For 6 of the 9 satisfaction variables, participants reported being satisfied/very satisfied with training on a simulator with driving assistive technologies 76% to 100% of the time. EXP was satisfied to have been able to use simulator sessions before going on the road (100%). Participants determined to be fit to drive on an on-road test following simulator training showed no significant difficulty continuing with the training. EXP reported temporary discomfort on the simulator during the initial session (88%). Conclusion: Simulators provide some advantages for training drivers with adaptive aids in a safe context. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION Among individuals with motor impairments who used to drive:   All participants reported a high level of satisfaction training on the simulator with assistive technologies. The simulator proved to be an interesting tool for initiating training with new driving AT in a safe environment at no cost to individuals. The few discomforts reported during the first session resolved over time when participants continued with the driving simulator protocol. Occupational therapists noticed that the difficulties observed on the simulator were the same as those observed during on-road testing. The simulator allowed participants to begin to learn how to operate a vehicle with new assistive technology in a safe context.


Language: en

Keywords

Assistive device; adaptive driving device; driver training; hand controls; steering wheel knob

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print