|
Abstract
|
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a growing literature using event-level methods to estimate associations between contextual characteristics of drinking occasions, consumption levels, and acute harms. This literature spans many research traditions and has not been brought together as a whole. This mapping review aimed to identify and describe the theoretical approaches to conceptualising drinking occasions, study designs, predictors, and outcome measures used in existing research with a view to identifying dominant approaches, research gaps and areas for further synthesis.
METHODS: Eligible papers studied adults' drinking occasions using quantitative event-level methods and considered one or more contextual characteristics (e.g. venue, timing, or company) and at least one event-level consumption or acute alcohol-related harm outcome. We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and the Web of Science Social Sciences Citation Index, extracting data on studies' theoretical approach, data collection methods, settings, populations, drinking occasion characteristics, and outcome measures.
RESULTS: Searches identified 278 eligible papers (from 1975 to 2019), predominantly published after 2010 (n=181; 65.1%). Most papers reported research conducted in the United States (n=170; 61.2%) and half used student participants (n=133; 47.8%). Papers typically lacked a stated theoretical approach (n=203; 73.0%). Consistent with this, only 53 (19.1%) papers studied three or more occasion characteristics and most used methods that assume occasion characteristics do not change during an occasion (n=189; 68.0%). The most common outcome type considered was consumption (n=224; 80.6%) and only a few papers studied specific acute harm outcomes such as unprotected sex (n=24; 8.6%), drink driving (n=14; 5.0%) or sexual violence (n=9; 3.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Studies from 1975 to 2019 using event-level methods to estimate associations between contextual characteristics of drinking occasions, consumption levels, and acute harms were largely focused on students and consumption outcomes and most have considered a limited range of contextual characteristics.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Language: en |