SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Kirschbaum M, Barnett T, Cross M. Int. J. Drug Policy 2019; 73: 121-128.

Affiliation

University of Tasmania Centre for Rural Health, Locked Bag 1322, Launceston, Tasmania 7250, Australia. Electronic address: merylin.cross@utas.edu.au.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.10.002

PMID

31654934

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dependence on over-the-counter (OTC) codeine is recognised internationally as a rising public health issue. The effectiveness of health intervention strategies may be influenced by the beliefs held by those who are dependent. Applying Q methodology, this study aimed to identify shared accounts of OTC codeine dependence.

METHODS: Twenty-six participants from Tasmania, Australia, met eligibility criteria for the study as long-term OTC codeine users with a Severity of Dependence Score of five or higher. Forty-six opinion statements about OTC codeine dependence were sourced from the literature and online discussion forums. These were rank-ordered by participants from least to most agree and explanatory comments for the most strongly positioned statements were provided. By-person factor analysis was used to group participants who had sorted the statements similarly.

RESULTS: Two distinct accounts of OTC codeine dependence were identified. Participants representing Factor One, 'For pain, no shame', were not ashamed of their OTC codeine use, believed access should not be restricted and regarded it as necessary for the relief of physical pain. In contrast, Factor Two, 'My secret solace', was characterized by feelings of guilt and shame. Participants in this group intentionally used codeine for its effects on mood; to help them relax and to relieve stress, rather than solely for pain relief. They did not consider regular use of codeine to be socially acceptable and hid their use from others.

CONCLUSION: The way in which OTC codeine use is viewed by those who are dependent is not uniform. Two distinct accounts were identified in this sample. Participants from each group varied in their beliefs about access, causality, reasons for use and feelings of legitimacy and shame. An understanding of these differences can be used to better target interventions and guide policy for the prevention and management of OTC codeine dependence.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Attitudes; Codeine; Drug dependence; Over-the-counter; Q methodology; Substance abuse

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print