CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Ye X, Jones DA, Gaewsky J, Koya B, McNamara K, Saffarzadeh M, Putnam J, Somers J, Gayzik FS, Stitzel JD, Weaver A. J. Biomech. Eng. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub. |
|
Affiliation |
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Virginia-Tech Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics, 575 N. Patterson Ave, Suite 120, Winston-Salem, NC 27101. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2019, American Society of Mechanical Engineers) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
31701120 |
|
Abstract |
The goals of this study are to compare the lumbar spine response variance between the Hybrid III, Test device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR), and Global Human Body Models Consortium simplified 50th percentile (GHBMC M50-OS) finite element models, and evaluate the sensitivity of lumbar spine injury metrics to multidirectional acceleration pulses for spaceflight landing conditions. The Hybrid III, THOR, and GHBMC models were positioned in a baseline posture within a generic seat with side guards and a 5-point restraint system. Thirteen boundary conditions, which were categorized as loading condition variables and environmental variables, were included in the parametric study using a Latin Hypercube design of experiments. Each of the three models underwent 455 simulations for a total of 1,365 simulations. The Hybrid III and THOR models exhibited similar lumbar compression forces. The average lumbar compression force was 45% higher for Hybrid III (2.2±1.5 kN) and 51% higher for THOR (2.0±1.6 kN) compared to GHBMC (1.3±0.9 kN). Compared to Hybrid III, THOR sustained an average 64% higher lumbar flexion moment, and an average 436% higher lumbar extension moment. The GHBMC model sustained much lower bending moments compared to Hybrid III and THOR. Regressions revealed that lumbar spine responses were more sensitive to loading condition variables than environmental variables across all models. This study quantified the inter-model lumbar response variations and sensitivity between Hybrid III, THOR, and GHBMC. Language: en |