SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ito R, Kubota K, Yaguchi S, Furudate K, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi W. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.joms.2019.10.023

PMID

31783003

Abstract

PURPOSE: Falls are a common cause of the maxillofacial fractures, and falls associated with loss of consciousness might have special characteristics. The purpose of the present study was to measure the association between the types of falls and maxillofacial injury severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present retrospective cross-sectional study focused on patients with maxillofacial fractures resulting from falls who had been treated at the Hirosaki University Hospital from 1990 to 2016. The falls were divided into 2 categories according to the reason for their occurrence: 1) falls from slipping, tripping, or stumbling (STSFs); and 2) falls from loss of consciousness (LOCFs). The primary outcome measure of the present study was the severity of the maxillofacial fractures. The secondary outcomes were the pattern of maxillofacial fractures, pattern of concomitant injuries, and treatment modality. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent predictors for fracture severity.

RESULTS: A total of 148 patients had been admitted for maxillofacial fractures resulting from falls. The sample included 107 STSFs (72.3%) and 41 LOCFs (27.7%). The cause of the LOCFs was orthostatic-hypotension syncope in 13 patients, neurally mediated syncope in 10, cardiogenic syncope in 9, epilepsy in 5, and other in 4 patients. The proportion of mandibular fractures and the mean facial injury severity scale score were significantly greater in the LOCF group (2.20 ± 1.19) than in the STSF group (1.65 ± 1.15; P = .0067). The incidence of concomitant injuries was significantly greater in the STSF group than in the LOCF group (P = .023), and the distribution of sites was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS: Our results have shown that maxillofacial fractures secondary to LOCFs tend to be more severe and to have a lower incidence of concomitant injuries compared with STSFs. We believe these features originate from the absence of protective reflexes resulting from the loss of consciousness.

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print