SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Martin A, Paddock M, Johns CS, Smith J, Raghavan A, Connolly DJA, Offiah AC. Eur. Radiol. 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Department of Radiology, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK. a.offiah@sheffield.ac.uk.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00330-019-06579-w

PMID

31797078

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether head CT with 3D reconstruction can replace skull radiographs (SXR) in the imaging investigation of suspected physical abuse (SPA)/abusive head trauma (AHT).

METHODS: PACS was interrogated for antemortem skeletal surveys performed for SPA, patients younger than 2 years, SXR and CT performed within 4 days of each other. Paired SXR and CT were independently reviewed. One reviewer analysed CT without and (3 months later) with 3D reconstructions. SXR and CT expert consensus review formed the gold standard. Observer reliability was calculated.

RESULTS: A total of 104 SXR/CT examination pairs were identified, mean age 6.75 months (range 4 days to 2 years); 21 (20%) had skull fractures; two fractures on CT were missed on SXR. There were no fractures on SXR that were not seen on CT. For SXR and CT, respectively: PPV reviewer 1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 48-82% and 85-100%; reviewer 2, 67-98% and 82-100%; and NPV reviewer 1, 95%, CI 88-98% and 96-100%; reviewer 2, 88-97% and 88-98%. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were respectively the following: SXR, excellent (kappa = 0.831) and good (kappa = 0.694); CT, excellent (kappa = 0.831) and perfect (kappa = 1). All results were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: CT has greater diagnostic accuracy than SXR in detecting skull fractures which is increased on concurrent review of 3D reconstructions and should be performed in every case of SPA/AHT. SXR does not add further diagnostic information and can be omitted from the skeletal survey when CT with 3D reconstruction is going to be, or has been, performed. KEY POINTS: • Head CT with 3D reconstruction is more sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of skull fractures. • Skull radiographs can be safely omitted from the initial skeletal survey performed for suspected physical abuse when head CT with 3D reconstruction is going to be, or has been, performed.


Language: en

Keywords

Abusive head trauma; Child abuse; Physical abuse; Skull fracture; Tomography, spiral computed

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print