SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Andrew A, Attanasio O, Augsburg B, Day M, Grantham-McGregor S, Meghir C, Mehrin F, Pahwa S, Rubio-Codina M. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 2019; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/jcpp.13171

PMID

31797385

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An estimated 63.4 million Indian children under 5 years are at risk of poor development. Home visits that use a structured curriculum to help caregivers enhance the quality of the home stimulation environment improve developmental outcomes. However, achieving effectiveness in poor urban contexts through scalable models remains challenging.

METHODS: Using a cluster randomised controlled trial, we evaluated a psychosocial stimulation intervention, comprising weekly home visits for 18 months, in urban slums of Cuttack, Odisha, India. The intervention is complementary to existing early childhood services in India and was run and managed through a local branch of a national NGO. The study ran from August 2013 to July 2015. We enrolled 421 children aged 10-20 months from 54 slums. Slums were randomised to intervention or control. Primary outcomes were children's cognitive, receptive language, expressive language and fine motor development assessed using the Bayley-III. Prespecified intent-to-treat analysis investigated impacts and heterogeneity by gender. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ISRCTN89476603, AEARCTR-0000169.

RESULTS: Endline data for 378 (89.8%) children were analysed. Attrition was balanced between groups. We found improvements of 0.349 of a standard deviation (SD; p = .005, stepdown p = .017) to cognition while impacts on receptive language, expressive language and fine motor development were, respectively, 0.224 SD (p = .099, stepdown p = .184), 0.192 SD (p = .085, stepdown p = .184) and 0.111 (p = .385, stepdown p = .385). A child development factor improved by 0.301 SD (p = .032). Benefits were larger for boys. The quality of the home stimulation environment also improved.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a potentially scalable home-visiting intervention is effective in poor urban areas.

© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.


Language: en

Keywords

Child development; home visiting; parent-child interaction

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print