Citation

Riggs W. Transp. Res. Proc. 2019; 41: 204-218.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Publications)

DOI

10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.039

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Many studies have noted that denser and more accessible environments with higher level-of-service (LOS) tend to encourage higher levels of walking and bicycling activity. As streets are increasingly designed to facilitate safe cycling through built environment interventions, little has been done to evaluate perceptions of safety on different typologies, particularly one vs. two-way corridors. Theory would suggest that many individuals frame their commutes based in-part on the perceived safety of the environment, yet little research looks at varying street design and this perception. This study uses a moving camera approach to evaluate the perceived cycling comfort for drivers and cyclists on different roadway designs (multi-lane, one way; two-way, bidirectional street; single-lane, one-way).

RESULTS show that perceived safety can influence comfort and potentially modal choice--particularly for parents. If parents perceive routes as unsafe they are reticent to allow their children to walk or bike. Furthermore, we show both drivers and cyclists have different perceptions of speed and relative safety of varying street designs; with those in a driving role perceiving multi-lane corridors as faster traveling and those cyclists perceiving them as less safe. This finding has implications for continued investment in built environment solutions that include street reconfigurations, as well as for increased programs to education and reduce psychological / socio-cognitive barriers that may impede cycling behaviour.

Language: en

Keywords

availability bias; behavioural economics; Cycling; perceptions