SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Pereira E, Moysés SJ, Ignácio SA, Mendes DK, Silva DSDA, Carneiro E, Hardy AMTG, Rosa EAR, Bettega PVC, Johann ACBR. BMC Public Health 2019; 19(1): e1650.

Affiliation

Graduate Program, Life Sciences School, Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Imaculada Conceição, 1155, Prado Velho, Curitiba, PR, CEP 8021, Brazil. aline.johann@pucpr.br.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group - BMC)

DOI

10.1186/s12889-019-8004-6

PMID

31818274

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To verify the prevalence and profile of users and non-users of anabolic steroid (AS) among resistance training practitioners.

METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional survey was performed in 100 gyms in Curitiba city, involving 5773 individuals and self-administered questionnaires. The chi-square and z-tests of proportions were used for comparison between the groups (p < 0.05).

RESULTS: 83.2% did not use, 9.1% formerly used, 3.4% currently used, and 4.3% intended used AS. The prevalence of former or current AS users was 16.9 and 6.5% among men and women, respectively. The prevalence ratios were as follows: 1) 2.6 male users for each woman; 2) 3.3 individuals aged 30-44 years and 2.8 individuals aged 18-29 years for each individual aged over 45 years. Beginners were not interested in using AS, but individuals who had trained longer had higher prevalence of AS use.

CONCLUSIONS: The gym environment encouraged the use of AS owing to aesthetic appeal. Thus, suggesting the need for actions to prevent abusive use of AS considering the practitioners profile (practitioners were young, university and single).


Language: en

Keywords

Anabolic agents; Cross-sectional studies; Prevalence; Resistance training

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print