SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Valencia-Sanchez C, Gorelkin VC, Mrugala MM, Sharma A, Vora SA, Ashman JB, Daniels TB, Halyard MY, Rule WG, Zhang N, Butterfield RJ, Schild SE, Porter AB. Neurooncol. Pract. 2019; 6(6): 484-489.

Affiliation

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2019, Oxford University Press)

DOI

10.1093/nop/npz027

PMID

31832219

PMCID

PMC6899051

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines to provide recommendations about driving restrictions for patients with brain metastases are lacking. We aim to determine whether clinical neurologic examination is sufficient to predict suitability to drive in these patients by comparison with an occupational therapy driving assessment (OTDA).

METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the concordance between neurology assessment of suitability to drive (pass/fail) and OTDA in 41 individuals with brain metastases. Neuro-oncology evaluation included an interview and neurological examination. Participants subsequently underwent OTDA during which a battery of objective measures of visual, cognitive, and motor skills related to driving was administered.

RESULTS: The mean age of patients who failed OTDA was age 68.9 years vs 59.3 years in the group members who passed (P =.0046). The sensitivity of the neurology assessment to predict driving fitness compared with OTDA was 16.1% and the specificity 90%. The 31 patients who failed OTDA were more likely to fail Vision Coach, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Trail Making B tests.

CONCLUSIONS: There was poor association between the assessment of suitability to drive by neurologists and the outcome of the OTDA in patients with brain metastases. Subtle deficits that may impair the ability to drive safely may not be evident on neurologic examination. The positive predictive value was high to predict OTDA failure. Age could be a factor affecting OTDA performance. The results raise questions about the choice of assessments in making recommendations about driving fitness in people with brain metastases. OTDA should be strongly considered in patients with brain metastases who wish to continue driving.

© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.


Language: en

Keywords

brain metastases; fitness to drive

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print