Citation

Wilson JE, Shinall MC, Leath TC, Wang L, Harrell FE, Wilson LD, Nordness MF, Rakhit S, de Riesthal MR, Duff MC, Pandharipande PP, Patel MB. Ann. Surg. 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

Nashville Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Centers.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

10.1097/SLA.0000000000003389

PMID

31972638

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the health utility states of the most commonly used traumatic brain injury (TBI) clinical trial endpoint, the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Health utilities represent the strength of one's preferences under conditions of uncertainty. There are insufficient data to indicate how an individual would value levels of disability after a TBI.

METHODS: This was a cross-sectional web-based online convenience sampling adaptive survey. Using a standard gamble approach, participants evaluated their preferences for GOSE health states 1 year after a hypothetical TBI. The categorical GOSE was studied from vegetative state (GOSE2) to upper good recovery (GOSE8). Median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) health utility values for different GOSE states after TBI, ranging from -1 (worse than death) to 1 (full health), with 0 as reference (death).

RESULTS: Of 3508 eligible participants, 3235 (92.22%) completed the survey. Participants rated lower GOSE states as having lower utility, with some states rated as worse than death, though the relationship was nonlinear and intervals were unequal between health states. Over 75% of participants rated a vegetative state (GOSE2, absence of awareness and bedridden) and about 50% rated lower severe disability (GOSE3, housebound needing all-day assistance) as conditions worse than death.

CONCLUSIONS: In the largest investigation of public perceptions about post-TBI disability, we demonstrate unequally rated health states, with some states perceived as worse than death. Although limited by selection bias, these results may guide future comparative-effectiveness research and shared medical decision-making after neurologic injury.

Language: en