SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Olekhnovitch R, Hoertel N, Limosin F, Blanco C, Olfson M, Fagot-Campagna A, Fossati P, Haffen E, Goldberg M, Zins M, Lemogne C. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2020; 123: 72-80.

Affiliation

Université de Paris, Faculté de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France; AP-HP.Centre - Université de Paris, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Service de Psychiatrie et Addictologie de l'adulte et du Sujet âgé, 75105, Paris, France; Université de Paris, INSERM, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), UMR_S1266, F-75014, Paris, France. Electronic address: cedric.lemogne@aphp.fr.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.01.017

PMID

32036076

Abstract

Ranking antidepressants according to their acceptability (i.e. a combination of both efficacy and tolerability) in the general population may help choosing the best first-line medication. This study aimed to rank antidepressants according to the proportion of filled prescription sequences consistent with a continuation of the first treatment versus those consistent with a change. A first step was validating this measure as a proxy of acceptability by examining the association of these two kinds of sequences with levels of depressive symptoms. Among 64,467 individuals included in the French population-based Constances cohort, reimbursements of antidepressants from January 2009 to December 2015 were extracted from the French national health insurance system claims database. Depressive symptoms were measured at inclusion with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). Between January 2010 and December 2015, 6675 participants newly initiated an antidepressant (34.5% men, mean (SD) age: 48.3 (12.1) years). Among the subsample of participants included during the six-month period following treatment initiation, individuals with continuation sequences had lower levels of depressive symptoms than those with change sequences (mean (SE) CES-D score: 18.9 (0.8) versus 26.5 (2.1), p < 0.001). According to the continuation/change ratio observed over this six-month period in all participants, escitalopram ranked first, followed by sertraline, venlafaxine, citalopram, fluoxetine and paroxetine. In an independent replication sample representative of the French national population, the same six medications ranked first, with escitalopram remaining in first place. The proportion of filled prescription sequences consistent with a continuation versus a change of the first prescribed treatment may provide a widely available measure of antidepressant acceptability in community practice.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Antidepressive agents; Big data; Cohort studies; Depressive disorder; Health; Insurance; Reimbursement

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print