Citation

Firestone G, Press S. Fam. Court Rev. 2020; 58(1): 9-25.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Association of Family and Conciliation Courts, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/fcre.12453

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The emergence of innovative family and child protection dispute resolution (DR) methods has resulted in a varying array of communication protections. Review of these communication protections in the United States reveals a lack of consistency and clarity within each form of DR, and no clear policy to guide the development of the different communication protections across the spectrum of DR methods. This article proposes a new term, privadentiality, to describe communication protections which may be provided for a wide range of DR methods and a framework for categorizing DR methods in order to develop more consistent and appropriate communication protections across the spectrum of DR. This article concludes with recommendations to improve party and professional understanding of DR communication protections; protect families from escalating conflict; promote the integrity of DR methods; and enable courts to appropriately review and, where appropriate, approve DR outcomes.

Language: en

Keywords

Arbitration; Collaborative Law; Confidentiality; Family Group Conferencing; Mediation; Parenting Coordination; Privadentiality; Privilege