SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hall M, Perraton LG, Stevermer CA, Gillette JC. Gait Posture 2020; 77: 283-287.

Affiliation

Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.02.011

PMID

32106044

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dynamic postural control during everyday tasks is poorly understood in people following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding dynamic postural control can provide insight into potentially modifiable impairments in people following ACLR who are at increased risk for second ACL injury and/or knee osteoarthritis. RESEARCH QUESTION: Determine whether measures indicative of dynamic postural control differ between individuals with and without ACLR during stair ascent and descent.

METHODS: Seventeen individuals with ACLR (>1 yr post-surgery) and 16 age and sex-matched healthy controls participated. Centre of pressure (COP) measures included: i) COP excursion, ii) COP velocity, and iii) dynamic time-toboundary (TTB). Mixed linear models were used to compare COP measures for the ACLR leg, non-ACLR leg, and healthy controls during stair ascent and stair descent.

RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences observed during stair ascent (all p > 0.05). Several statistical differences were found during stair descent for individual with ACLR, but not between those with ACLR and healthy controls. The ACLR leg had higher medial-lateral COP excursion (mean difference 1.06 cm, [95 %CI 0.08-2.06 cm], p = 0.036; effect size = 0.38) compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. In addition, the ACLR leg had a lower medial-lateral TTB (mean difference -13 ms [95 %CI -38 to 2 ms], p = 0.005; effect size = 0.49) and medial-lateral TTB normalized to stance time (mean difference -5.8 % [95 %CI -10.3 to 1.3 %], p = 0.012; effect size = 0.80) compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. No statistical differences were observed for anterior-posterior measures during stair descent (all p > 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: Taken together, findings indicate that there are small to large differences in medial-lateral postural control in the ACLR leg compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. Further work is required to understand clinical implication of these novel observations.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.


Language: en

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament; Centre of pressure; Knee biomechanics; Knee osteoarthritis; Stair

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print