SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jonauskaite D, Parraga CA, Quiblier M, Mohr C. Iperception 2020; 11(1): e2041669520902484.

Affiliation

Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/2041669520902484

PMID

32117561

PMCID

PMC7027086

Abstract

For many, colours convey affective meaning. Popular opinion assumes that perception of colour is crucial to influence emotions. However, scientific studies test colour-emotion relationships by presenting colours as patches or terms. When using patches, researchers put great effort into colour presentation. When using terms, researchers have much less control over the colour participants think of. In this between-subjects study, we tested whether emotion associations with colour differ between terms and patches. Participants associated 20 emotion concepts, loading on valence, arousal, and power dimensions, with 12 colours presented as patches (n = 54) or terms (n = 78). We report high similarity in the pattern of associations of specific emotion concepts with terms and patches (r = .82), for all colours except purple (r = .-23). We also observed differences for black, which is associated with more negative emotions and of higher intensity when presented as a term than a patch. Terms and patches differed little in terms of valence, arousal, and power dimensions. Thus, results from studies on colour-emotion relationships using colour terms or patches should be largely comparable. It is possible that emotions are associated with colour concepts rather than particular perceptions or words of colour.

© The Author(s) 2020.


Language: en

Keywords

Geneva Emotion Wheel; affect; colour; metaphors; semantic associations

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print