Citation

Wu Y, Kihara K, Hasegawa K, Takeda Y, Sato T, Akamatsu M, Kitazaki S. J. Saf. Res. 2020; 72: 231-238.

Affiliation

Automotive Human Factors Research Center, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Japan.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, U.S. National Safety Council, Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.019

PMID

32199568

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: During SAE level 3 automated driving, the driver's role changes from active driver to fallback-ready driver. Drowsiness is one of the factors that may degrade driver's takeover performance. This study aimed to investigate effects of non-driving related tasks (NDRTs) to counter driver's drowsiness with a Level 3 system activated and to improve successive takeover performance in a critical situation. A special focus was placed on age-related differences in the effects.

METHOD: Participants of three age groups (younger, middle-aged, older) drove the Level 3 system implemented in a high-fidelity motion-based driving simulator for about 30 min under three experiment conditions: without NDRT, while watching a video clip, and while switching between watching a video clip and playing a game. The Karolinska Sleepiness Scale and eyeblink duration measured driver drowsiness. At the end of the drive, the drivers had to take over control of the vehicle and manually change the lane to avoid a collision. Reaction time and steering angle variability were measured to evaluate the two aspects of driving performance.

RESULTS: For younger drivers, both single and multiple NDRT engagements countered the development of driver drowsiness during automated driving, and their takeover performance was equivalent to or better than their performance without NDRT engagement. For older drivers, NDRT engagement did not affect the development of drowsiness but degraded takeover performance especially under the multiple NDRT engagement condition. The results for middle-aged drivers fell at an intermediate level between those for younger and older drivers. Practical Applications: The present findings do not support general recommendations of NDRT engagement to counter drowsiness during automated driving. This study is especially relevant to the automotive industry's search for options that will ensure the safest interfaces between human drivers and automation systems.

Copyright © 2020 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Age-related differences; Automated driving; Drowsiness; Eyeblink duration; Non-driving related task