Citation

Amaral-Felipe KMD, Yamada PA, Abreu DCC, Freire Junior RC, Stroppa-Marques AEZ, Hallal CZ, Faganello-Navega FR. Hum. Mov. Sci. 2020; 70: e102599.

Affiliation

Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida vinte e quatro A, 1515, CEP 13506-900 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy, School of Philosophy and Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenida Hygino Muzzi FIlho, 737, CEP 17525-000 Marília, São Paulo, Brazil.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.humov.2020.102599

PMID

32217200

Abstract

Safe street crossing is important for older adults' social inclusion. We assessed gait kinematic adaptation under different simulated street crossing conditions in older adults with Parkinson's disease (PD) and made comparisons with older adults without PD to understand how PD interferes in outdoor task performance, helping in the development of strategies to reduce road traffic accident risk. In 20 older adults without PD (control group - CG) and 20 with PD (GPD), we assessed usual gait (C1), gait during street crossing simulation (C2), and gait during reduced-time street crossing simulation (C3). Velocity, step length, and step, swing, stance, and double support time were analyzed. Spatiotemporal differences in gait between groups and conditions were analyzed. The GPD walked 16% slower in C1 and 12% slower in C2 and C3 than the CG. GPD also took 11% shorter steps in C1 and 9.5% shorter steps in C2. The double support time was 8.5% greater in C1. In intragroup comparisons, there were significant differences in all gait conditions. The CG showed increased velocity (C2 15% > C1; C3 13% > C2; C3 26% > C1), step length (C2 8% > C1; C3 5% > C2; C3 13% > C1), and swing time (C2 2% > C1; C3 3.7% > C2; C3 6% > C1), and decreased step time (C2 7.5% < C1; C3 8% < C2; C3 15% < C1), stance time (C2 1.3% < C1; C3 2.5% < C2; C3 3.6% < C1), and double support time (C2 6.3% < C1; C3 10.5% < C2; C3 16% < C1). GPD showed increased velocity (C2 19% > C1; C3 13.5% > C2; C3 29.7% > C1), step length, (C2 6% > C1; C3 7% > C2; C3 16% > C1), and swing time (C2 3% > C1; C3 3% > C2; C3 5.5% > C1) and decreased step time (C2 10.3% < C1; C3 7.7% < C2; C3 17% < C1), stance time (C2 1.7% < C1; C3 1.7% < C2; C3 3.4% < C1), and double support time (C2 7% < C1; C3 9.5% < C2; C3 16% < C1). Kinematic changes observed in the intergroup comparison show that participants with PD had lower velocity in all conditions. However, per the intragroup results, both participants with and without PD managed to significantly modify gait variables to attempt to cross the street in the given time. It is necessary to assess whether this increases fall risk by exposing them to road traffic accidents.

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Language: en

Keywords

Gait; Kinematics; Older adults; Parkinson's disease; Street crossing