SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hussein A, Elsawah S, Abbass HA. Ergonomics 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Affiliation

School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00140139.2020.1764112

PMID

32370651

Abstract

Automation reliability and transparency are key factors for trust calibration and as such can have distinct effects on human reliance behaviour and mission performance. One question that remains unexplored is: what are the implications of reliability and transparency on trust calibration for human-swarm interaction? We investigate this research question in the context of human-swarm interaction, as swarm systems are becoming more popular for their robustness and versatility. Thirty-two participants performed swarm-based tasks under different reliability and transparency conditions. The results indicate that trust, whether it is reliability- or transparency-based, indicates high reliance rates and shorter response times. Reliability-based trust is negatively correlated with correct rejection rates while transparency-based trust is positively correlated with these rates. We conclude that reliability and transparency have distinct effects on trust calibration.Practitioner Summary: Reliability and transparency have distinct effects on trust calibration.

FINDINGS from our human experiments suggest that transparency is a necessary design requirement if and when humans need to be involved in the decision-loop of human-swarm systems, especially when swarm reliability is high.


Language: en

Keywords

Complacency; Human-Swarm Teaming; Reliability; Reliance

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print