SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Vik BF, Rasmussen K, Schei B, Hagemann CT. Forensic Sci. Int. Synergy 2020; 2: 98-106.

Affiliation

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Olavs Hospital, P.B. 3250 Sluppen, N-7006, Trondheim, Norway.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.02.003

PMID

32412007

PMCID

PMC7219117

Abstract

AIM: To explore differences in police investigations between cases of rape against women with and without vulnerability factors.

METHODS: Retrospective, descriptive study of cases of rape against women ≥16 years of age. Cases involving victims with and without vulnerability factors were compared regarding the quality of police investigation.

RESULTS: Vulnerability was present among 68% of the victims. Cases with vulnerable victims had an adjusted odds ratio for a low-quality police investigation of 2.1 (95% CI [1.0-4.4]) compared to cases where victims were non-vulnerable.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not prove that rape myths existed among police officers. Our findings show a trend indicating that vulnerable victims may have been less prioritized compared to non-vulnerable victims. More studies are needed regarding how the police respond to rape complaints and to what degree police investigations are influenced by different characteristics of victims.

© 2020 The Authors.


Language: en

Keywords

Police investigation; Rape; Rape myths; Victim vulnerability

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print