Citation

Yaksic E. J. Crim. Psychol. 2020; 10(2): 123-144.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/JCP-09-2019-0032

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this article is to improve the use of evidence-based practice and research utilization in the offender profiling process. The use of offender profiling has been met with increasing resistance given its exaggerated accuracy. The "Investigative Journalist/Expert Field Micro Task Force" model, a collaborative method that incorporates offender profiling and is designed to address unresolved serial homicides, is introduced and evaluated alongside recommendations on attaining adherence.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH The model was field tested in 17 instances. The measures used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to gauge the usefulness of their case consultations, whether their input helped catch the offender, offer new leads, move the case forward, provide new avenues or give new ideas, were used to evaluate the model.

FINDINGS The model established likely patterns of serial murder activity among strangulations of women in Chicago, Cleveland, and Panama and resulted in convictions of suspects in Louisiana and Kansas City. This model is valuable when used to parse modern-day offenders from those who committed unresolved homicides as the latter display different behaviors that can make investigations difficult endeavors.

RESULTS from the field tests mirror those from the literature in that profiling alone did not result in the capture of serial killers. Instead, profiling was used in conjunction with other efforts and mainly as a means to keep the investigation moving forward.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE Unresolved homicides are at a point of crisis and represent a significant but largely unaddressed societal problem. The success of this model may compel law enforcement to restore faith in offender profiling.

Language: en

Keywords

Cold case; Collaboration; Investigation; Law enforcement; Profiling; Serial homicide