SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Guimarães M, Monteiro MM, Matos RT, Furtado MC, Maia HF, Almeida LRS, Filho JO, Pinto EB. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2020; 29(9): e104985.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, National Stroke Association (U.S.A.), Publisher Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104985

PMID

32807417

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the Recurrent Fall Risk Scale (ReFR) in community-dwelling stroke survivors.

METHODS: Cohort of stroke survivors with independent gait ability recruited from a reference outpatient stroke clinic. Besides sociodemographic and clinical data, the following scales were used: Modified Barthel Index (mBI), ReFR scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Participants were followed up for 12 months to record the incidence of falls. Accuracy of the ReFR scale was measured by the area under the ROC curve.

RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen individuals were recruited between April 2016 and November 2016: mean age 54 years (± 14), 55% women, median time since the last stroke 24 months (range 12 -48 months), posterior vascular territory affected in 35% of the sample. Median NIHSS was 3 (range 1 to 6), median mBI 49 (range 46-50), median ReFR 3 (range 2 to 5). During the follow-up period, 32 (33%) subjects had at least one fall and 18 (19%) were recurrent fallers (two or more falls). The accuracy of ReFR scale was 0.67 (95% CI = 0.54-0.79), p = 0.026.

CONCLUSION: This study externally validated the ReFR as a tool to predict recurrent falls in individuals after stroke.


Language: en

Keywords

Community; Stroke; Recurrent falls; Prediction; Scale

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print