SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Higginson R, Letheren A, Selfe J, Greenhalgh S, Mercer C. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2020; 50: e102248.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102248

PMID

32919291

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presentation and management of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) remains contentious in medical literature, however it is widely agreed that CES requires emergency medical attention. Physiotherapists will often refer suspected cases to A&E departments for emergency medical review in order to safeguard patient safety.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the management of patients triaged by a national telephone service referred to A&E for suspected CES.

METHOD: Known escalations (17 cases) from January 2017 to June 2017 from a national telephone triage service referred to A&E with suspected CES were included.

RESULTS: 53% of cases with CES symptoms that conformed to the BASS definition of having a requirement for diagnostic imaging were not investigated by MRI scan. The MRI and non-MRI groups had similar group sizes (8 : 9) and mean ages (42.4 years ± 8SD and 45.7 years ± 12SD). Overall, there were more females (11) compared to males (6) referred to A&E.

CONCLUSION: There appears to be significant variability in the management of this cohort of patients once referred to emergency departments. Further guidance is needed as to when watchful waiting is clinically appropriate, and what best practice should be to facilitate safe patient management.


Language: en

Keywords

Triage; Telephone; Cauda equina syndrome; Physiotherapy; Physiotherapy escalation management

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print