SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Shachat M, Hong F, Lin Y, Desivilya HS, Yassour-Borochowitz D, Akhurst J, Leach MM, Malley-Morrison K. J. Aggress. Confl. Peace Res. 2020; 12(2): 87-98.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Emerald Group Publishing)

DOI

10.1108/JACPR-11-2019-0454

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aim to examine the themes of moral disengagement (MD) and engagement in reasoning regarding a putative governmental right to kill innocent civilians when fighting terrorism.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH In total, 147 participants from Israel, 101 from the USA and 80 from South Africa provided quantitative rating scale responses and qualitative explanations about such a putative right. Qualitative responses were coded for presence or absence of indices of MD and engagement.

FINDINGS In ANOVAs by gender and country, men scored higher than women on rating scale scores indicating support for the right; there were no significant national differences on these scores. Chi-square analyses with the coded qualitative responses indicated more men than women gave morally disengaged responses, proportionately more South Africans than Israelis provided morally disengaged responses and proportionately more South Africans and Americans than Israelis provided morally engaged responses. Pearson correlation analyses indicated that MD was positively correlated with rating scale scores and moral engagement was negatively related to rating scale scores in all three countries. Research limitations/implications Regarding limitations, it is difficult to know how the omission of qualitative explanations of rating scale responses by many participants influenced the statistical findings - or how to interpret the more restricted level of qualitative responses in Israel and South Africa as compared to the USA. Social implications Programs designed to counteract MD have the potential for helping reduce support for war and its inhumanities across diverse nations.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE This is the first study on MD to compare American, Israeli and South African perspectives on the justifiability of human rights violations in the war on terror. The findings go beyond earlier studies in finding gender differences in MD that occurred across three very different nations in three very different parts of the world.


Language: en

Keywords

Cross-cultural; Gender differences; Innocent civilians; International terrorism; Moral disengagement; Moral engagement

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print