SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Zaręba K, Banasiewicz J, Rozenek H, Wójtowicz S, Jakiel G. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020; 17(23): e8726.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/ijerph17238726

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study aimed at the identification of the risk factors present during delivery, which might be present in prophylactic programs concerning postpartum mood disorders. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was a retrospective comparative study. The study material included data retrieved from the medical records of patients hospitalized in the Teaching Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Professor Orłowski Hospital in Warsaw, in the years 2010-2017. The EPDS data of 604 patients were analyzed. The study group included 75 women who obtained at least 12 points in the EPDS and the control group was made up of 75 women who obtained no more than 5 points in the EPDS.

RESULTS: The women in whom we noted an increased risk of developing mood disorders had blood loss >1000 mL and had a significantly longer stage II and III of labor than the control group. Other risk factors were cesarean section, vaginal delivery with the curettage of the uterine cavity, slightly lower APGAR scores (0.4 pts), and lower birth weight (approximately 350 g) of the child. Women at a low risk of postpartum mood disorders more commonly underwent episiotomy during delivery (76%).

CONCLUSIONS: Increased supervision and support should be offered to women who experienced the above-mentioned risk factors.


Language: en

Keywords

postpartum depression; baby blues; EPDS; postpartum mood disorders; predictors of postpartum depression; risk factors of postpartum depression

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print