SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Dalrymple-Alford JC, Kerr PA, Jones RD. J. Stud. Alcohol 2003; 64(1): 93-97.

Affiliation

Christchurch Movement Disorders and Brain Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8004, New Zealand. psyc338@psyc.canterbury.ac.nz

Copyright

(Copyright © 2003, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12608488

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effect of alcohol on driving-related tracking tasks at four times of day was examined to address concerns that the legal driving alcohol threshold in New Zealand (80 mg/dl blood) may have greater effects during the early afternoon and early morning than during the evening and midmorning. METHOD: A volunteer group of 16 male army personnel provided a homogenous sample with respect to time-of-day characteristics. After a formal practice session, members of the sample performed lateral (one-dimensional) tracking tasks in eight counterbalanced sessions, either with or without alcohol (0.836 g/kg), at 0900, 1300, 1800 and 0100 hours. The tasks varied in terms of smooth and ballistic motor pursuit, unpredictability and availability of target preview. RESULTS: Alcohol markedly impaired tracking accuracy (error from target), especially in nonpreview conditions. The only evidence for an overall time-of-day effect was on a ballistic pursuit nonpreview task, but there was no indication of any alcohol by time-of-day interactions. CONCLUSIONS: When tested 30 minutes after consumption of alcohol, sensorimotor tracking skills are markedly impaired at alcohol levels approaching the New Zealand threshold for legal driving, but these effects are not subject to circadian variations.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print