SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Simpson S, Goans C, Loh R, Ryall K, Allana Middleton MC, Dalton A. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2020; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2020, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/acem.14198

PMID

33346922

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We describe the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)-Clinical Practice Screener's ability to predict suicide and emergency department (ED) visits for self-harm in the year following an ED encounter.

METHODS: Screening data from adult patients' first ED encounter during a 27-month study period were analyzed. Patients were excluded if they died during the encounter or left without being identified. The outcomes were suicide as reported by the state health department and a recurrent ED visit for suicide attempt or self-harm reported by the state hospital association. Multivariable regression examined the screener's correlation with these outcomes.

RESULTS: Among 92,643 patients analyzed, eleven (0.01%) patients died by suicide within a year after ED visit. The screener's sensitivity and specificity for suicide by 30 days was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.00-0.41) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99). Sensitivity and specificity were better for predicting self-harm by 30 days: 0.53 (95% CI, 0.42-0.64) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97-0.97) respectively. Multivariable regression demonstrated that screening risk remained associated with both suicide and self-harm outcomes in the presence of covariates. Suicide risk was not mitigated by hospitalization or psychiatric intervention in the ED.

CONCLUSIONS: The C-SSRS screener is insensitive to suicide risk after ED discharge. Most patients who died by suicide screened negative and did not receive psychiatric services in the ED. Moreover, most patients with suicidal ideation die by causes other than suicide. The screener was more sensitive for predicting non-fatal self-harm and may inform a comprehensive risk assessment. These results compel us to re-imagine the provision of emergency psychiatric services.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print