SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Mena-Tudela D, Iglesias-Casás S, González-Chordá VM, Cervera-Gasch, Andreu-Pejó L, Valero-Chilleron MJ. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021; 18(1): e199.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/ijerph18010199

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND: obstetric violence can partially be represented by the high number of interventions and medicalization rates during the birthing process. The objective of the present study was to determine the interventionism and medicalization levels during childbirth in Spain.

METHODS: a descriptive, retrospective, and cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2018 and June 2019.

RESULTS: the intervention percentages were 34.2% for Kristeller maneuver and 39.3% for episiotomy. Differences appeared in public, private, and mixed healthcare settings (p < 0.001). The mean satisfaction, with healthcare in the different settings, was estimated at 6.88 points (SD ± 2.146) in public healthcare, 4.76 points (SD ± 3.968) in private healthcare, and 8.03 points (SD ± 1.930) in mixed healthcare (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in Spanish autonomous communities.

CONCLUSIONS: births in Spain seem to be highly intervened. In this study, a certain equity criterion was found concerning interventionism during childbirth in Spain. Healthcare influenced female intervention, satisfaction, and perception levels for obstetric violence; this evidences that female empowerment plays an important role.


Language: en

Keywords

Spain; obstetric violence; interventionism; medicalization; midwife; sexual and reproduction health

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print