Citation

Christen M, Narvaez D, Zenk JD, Villano M, Crowell CR, Moore DR. PLoS One 2021; 16(3): e0247273.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Public Library of Science)

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0247273

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Crews operating remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs) in military operations may be among the few that truly experience tragic dilemmas similar to the famous Trolley Problem. In order to analyze decision-making and emotional conflict of RPA operators within Trolley-Problem-like dilemma situations, we created an RPA simulation that varied mission contexts (firefighter, military and surveillance as a control condition) and the social "value" of a potential victim. We found that participants (Air Force cadets and civilian students) were less likely to make the common utilitarian choice (sacrificing one to save five), when the value of the one increased, especially in the military context. However, in the firefighter context, this decision pattern was much less pronounced. The results demonstrate behavioral and justification differences when people are more invested in a particular context despite ostensibly similar dilemmas.

Language: en