Citation

Bracy K, Lul B, Roe-Sepowitz D. J. Hum. Traffick. 2021; 7(1): 35-52.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/23322705.2019.1638148

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

The scope of labor trafficking in the United States has been difficult to estimate due to a number of factors including the hidden nature of the crimes of labor trafficking. This study explores a cross-section of arrests of labor traffickers from 2013 to 2016. Arrests if 125 labor traffickers from 47 cases were analyzed. Labor trafficking arrests were found in 20 states over the four years with Texas (34.4%) having the highest percentage of arrests. Victims of labor trafficking were from 16 countries, with Mexico being the country where most victims originated. Victims experienced labor trafficking in homes (35.2%), restaurants (34.4%), hotels (8%), apartments (6.4%), agriculture fields (4.8%), and group homes (4.8%). Staffing agencies were used prominently as recruiting tools by labor traffickers and violence was often used to retain the victim in the trafficking situation. Gender differences and differences between independent labor traffickers and criminal organizations were explored. Recommendations include the need for increased trainings for law enforcement and community members to improve detection as well as the need to enhance the current level of services available to labor trafficking victims.

Keywords: Human trafficking;

Language: en

Keywords

debt bondage; forced labor; labor exploitation; labor trafficker; Labor trafficking; trafficking