SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bradshaw CJA, Meagher P, Thiele MJ, Harcourt RG, Huveneers C. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2021; 8(3): 201197.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Royal Society Publishing)

DOI

10.1098/rsos.201197

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Despite the low chance of a person being bitten by a shark, there are serious associated costs. Electronic deterrents are currently the only types of personal deterrent with empirical evidence of a substantial reduction in the probability of being bitten by a shark. We aimed to predict the number of people who could potentially avoid being bitten by sharks in Australia if they wear personal electronic deterrents. We used the Australian Shark Attack File from 1900 to 2020 to develop sinusoidal time-series models of per capita incidents, and then stochastically projected these to 2066. We predicted that up to 1063 people (range: 185-2118) could potentially avoid being bitten across Australia by 2066 if all people used the devices. Avoiding death and injury of people over the next half-century is of course highly desirable, especially when considering the additional costs associated with the loss of recreational, commercial and tourism revenue potentially in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars following clusters of shark-bite events.


Language: en

Keywords

bull shark; shark attack; shark–human interactions; tiger shark; white shark

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print