SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Vaca FE, Li K, Fell JC, Haynie DL, Simons-Morton B, Romano EO. J. Transp. Health 2021; 21: 101068.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jth.2021.101068

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Introduction
Some of the most vulnerable groups of teens choose to delay driving licensure (DDL). We assessed longitudinal associations between state-level Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) restrictions and DDL among U.S. high school students.

Methods
Data from seven waves of the NEXT Generation Health Study (starting 10th-grade (2009-2010)), were analyzed in 2020 using Poisson regression. The outcome was DDL (delay vs. no-delay). Independent variables were driving restrictions (at learner and intermediate phases of licensure), sex, race/ethnicity, family affluence, parent education, family structure, and urbanicity.

Results
Of 2525 eligible for licensure, 887 (38.9%), 1078 (30.4%), 560 (30.7%) reported DDL 1-2 years, >2 years, no DDL, respectively. Interactions between GDL restrictions during the learner permit period and covariates were found. In states requiring ≥30 h of supervised practice driving, Latinos (Adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 1.55, p < .001) and Blacks (aRRR = 1.38, p < .01) were more likely to DDL than Whites. In states where permit holding periods were <6 months, participants with low (aRRR = 1.61, p < .001) and moderate (aRRR = 1.45, p < .001) vs. high affluence were more likely to DDL. Participants in single-parent households vs. both-biological parent households were also more likely to DDL (aRRR = 1.37, p < .05). In states where permit holding periods were ≥6 months, participants with low (aRRR = 1.33, p < .05) vs. high affluence were more likely to DDL. In states that allowed ≥3 passengers or no passenger restriction, participants living in non-urban vs. urban (aRRR = 1.52, p < .05) areas were more likely to DDL, and in states that allowed only 1 or no passenger, participants living in non-urban vs. urban areas (aRRR = 0.67, p < .001) were less likely to DDL.

Conclusions
Our findings heighten concerns about increased crash risk among older teens who age out of state GDL policies thereby circumventing driver safety related restrictions. Significant disparities in DDL exist among more vulnerable teens in states with stricter GDL driving restrictions.


Language: en

Keywords

Delay in driving licensure; Disparities; Graduated driver licensing; Longitudinal; Novice drivers; Teen driver

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print