Citation

Könen T, Karbach J. Adv. Meth. Pract. Psychol. Sci. 2021; 4(1): e2515245920979172.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, SAGE Publishing)

DOI

10.1177/2515245920979172

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Intervention studies can be expensive and time-consuming, which is why it is important to extract as much knowledge as possible. We discuss benefits and limitations of analyzing individual differences in intervention studies in addition to traditional analyses of average group effects. First, we present a short introduction to latent change modeling and measurement invariance in the context of intervention studies. Then, we give an overview on options for analyzing individual differences in intervention-related changes with a focus on how substantive information can be distinguished from methodological artifacts (e.g., regression to the mean). The main topics are benefits and limitations of predicting changes with baseline data and of analyzing correlated change. Both approaches can offer descriptive correlational information about individuals in interventions, which can inform future variations of experimental conditions. Applications increasingly emerge in the literature--from clinical, developmental, and educational psychology to occupational psychology--and demonstrate their potential across all of psychology.

Language: en

Keywords

correlated change; individual differences; intervention; latent change modeling; measurement invariance