SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bajcsy A, Bansal S, Ratner E, Tomlin CJ, Dragan AD. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021; 6(1): 24-31.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers)

DOI

10.1109/LRA.2020.3028049

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Designing human motion predictors which preserve safety while maintaining robot efficiency is an increasingly important challenge for robots operating in close physical proximity to people. One approach is to use robust control predictors that safeguard against every possible future human state, leading to safe but often too conservative robot plans. Alternatively, intent-driven predictors explicitly model how humans make decisions given their intent, leading to efficient robot plans. However, when the intent model is misspecified, the robot might confidently plan unsafe maneuvers. In this letter, we combine ideas from robust control and intent-driven human modelling to formulate a novel human motion predictor which provides robustness against misspecified human models, but reduces the conservatism of traditional worst-case predictors. Our approach predicts the human states by trusting the intent-driven model to decide only which human actions are completely unlikely. We then safeguard against all likely enough actions, much like a robust control predictor. We demonstrate in simulation and hardware how our approach safeguards against misspecified human intent models while not leading to overly conservative robot plans.


Language: en

Keywords

Collision avoidance; Computational modeling; Data models; Decision making; human-aware motion planning; Predictive models; Robots; Robust control; Safety in HRI

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print