Citation

Claudino JG, Afonso J, Sarvestan J, Lanza MB, Pennone J, Filho CAC, Serrão JC, Espregueira-Mendes J, Vasconcelos ALV, de Andrade MP, Rocha-Rodrigues S, Andrade R, Ramirez-Campillo R. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10(14).

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute)

DOI

10.3390/jcm10143184

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of strength training (ST), as compared to alternative multimodal or unimodal exercise programs, on the number of falls in older adults (≥60 years). Ten databases were consulted (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science), without limitations on language or publication date. Eligibility criteria were as follows: RCTs with humans ≥60 years of age of any gender with one group performing supervised ST and a group performing another type of exercise training, reporting data pertaining falls. Certainty of evidence was assessed with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Meta-analysis used a random effects model to calculate the risk ratio (RR) for number of falls. Five RCTs with six trials were included (n = 543, 76% women). There was no difference between ST and alternative exercise interventions for falls (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30, p = 0.99). The certainty of evidence was very low. No dose-response relationship could be established. In sum, ST showed comparable RR based on number of falls in older adults when compared to other multimodal or unimodal exercise modalities, but evidence is scarce and heterogeneous, and additional research is required for more robust conclusions.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020222908.

Language: en

Keywords

elderly; falls; public health; strength training; unimodal exercise programs