SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Patrick ME, Terry-McElrath YM. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2021; ePub(ePub): ePub.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2021, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/acer.14676

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The degree to which binge and high-intensity drinking prevalence estimates may vary from fixed threshold frequency and continuous maximum drinks measures is unknown. The current study compared adolescent 5+ drinks, 10+ drinks, and sex-specific binge drinking prevalence estimates from fixed threshold frequency and continuous maximum drinks measures.

METHODS: Data were obtained from 7,911 respondents participating in the 2018 and 2019 nationally-representative Monitoring the Future 12(th) grade surveys. Comparisons of frequency prevalence (e.g., any occasions of 5+ drinking using the frequency measure) versus maximum drinks prevalence (e.g., reporting 5 or more drinks using the maximum number of drinks measure) were made using all respondents and then separately within males and females.

RESULTS: Among the sample overall and within sex, binge drinking estimates from the 5+ frequency prevalence and 5+ maximum drinks prevalence measures evidenced overlapping confidence intervals (estimates were slightly higher for frequency prevalence); similar results were observed for high-intensity drinking 10+ frequency prevalence and 10+ maximum drinks prevalence. For example, among the sample overall, 5+ frequency prevalence was 11.4% [95% CI 10.3, 12.6]; 5+ maximum drinks prevalence was 10.7% [9.6, 11.8]; 10+ frequency prevalence was 5.1% [4.4, 5.8]; 10+ maximum drinks prevalence was 4.1% [3.5, 4.7]. Using sex-specific thresholds (i.e., 4+ drinks for females and 5+ drinks for males), binge frequency and maximum drinks levels also had overlapping confidence intervals. Binge drinking prevalence estimates for females were approximately 1.5 times higher using sex-specific (4+) versus universal (5+) thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative sample of 12th grade students, prevalence levels for 5+ and 10+ drinking did not differ significantly when using frequency versus maximum drinks measures. Among females, binge drinking prevalence was higher using sex-specific versus universal thresholds. Both the frequency and maximum drinks measures provided comparative estimates of binge and high-intensity drinking prevalence among older adolescents.


Language: en

Keywords

adolescent; survey; alcohol; binge drinking; high-intensity drinking

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print